On The Third Hand
A Proud member of the Brigade of Bellicose WomenThe liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil constitution, are worth defending at all hazards; and it is our duty to defend them against all attacks. — Samuel Adams
| On The Third HandA Proud member of the Brigade of Bellicose WomenThe liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil constitution, are worth defending at all hazards; and it is our duty to defend them against all attacks. — Samuel Adams |
| Old Articles by week 03 Mar - 09 Mar 24 Feb - 02 Mar 17 Feb - 23 Feb 10 Feb - 16 Feb 03 Feb - 09 Feb 27 Jan - 02 Feb 20 Jan - 26 Jan 13 Jan - 19 Jan 06 Jan - 12 Jan 30 Dec - 05 Jan 23 Dec - 29 Dec 16 Dec - 22 Dec 09 Dec - 15 Dec 02 Dec - 08 Dec 25 Nov - 01 Dec 18 Nov - 24 Nov 11 Nov - 17 Nov 04 Nov - 10 Nov My comments are my opinions. Links are my choice, but do not necessarily reflect my opinion. I often link to articles, sites and blogs with which I disagree. I try to look at all sides, but the fact that I'm human makes it impossible for me to view anything completely objectively. |
21 November, 2001: "Wrong question..."By Kathy Kinsley I've been following an online discussion at BBC. They are asking if the war is vindicated by the fall of the Taleban. They don't seem to understand that the Taleban are not the reason for this war. We are not after the Taleban, only after the terrorists they have been sheltering, and the terrorist training camps they have been hosting. Got that? Our objectives are to get the terrorists, and also to keep them too busy to mount any more attacks on the US. Considering the suspected sarin gas found in one -- now deserted -- terrorist camp and papers found that were left behind by fleeing Taleban and El Qaida, I would say that our military response has succeeded admirably. Is it vindicated? Hell yes!
15:29 EST | |