| Old Articles by week 03 Mar - 09 Mar 24 Feb - 02 Mar 17 Feb - 23 Feb 10 Feb - 16 Feb 03 Feb - 09 Feb 27 Jan - 02 Feb 20 Jan - 26 Jan 13 Jan - 19 Jan 06 Jan - 12 Jan 30 Dec - 05 Jan 23 Dec - 29 Dec 16 Dec - 22 Dec 09 Dec - 15 Dec 02 Dec - 08 Dec 25 Nov - 01 Dec 18 Nov - 24 Nov 11 Nov - 17 Nov 04 Nov - 10 Nov My comments are my opinions. Links are my choice, but do not necessarily reflect my opinion. I often link to articles, sites and blogs with which I disagree. I try to look at all sides, but the fact that I'm human makes it impossible for me to view anything completely objectively. | Thursday, 17 Jan 2002My previous rant was inspired by The Kolkatura LIbertarian's excellent post regarding cultural integration (which gave me the term I wanted) and Fred Pruitt's comments on PC culture having 'no senzayuma' (page down a bit). I've been looking for a word (or phrase) to describe what I see as multicultural, and couldn't quite come up with one. Suman Palit did that, and gave a perfect explanation of what I see as truly multicultural activity. Fred Pruitt's post just got my bellicosity index up; I agree completely with his comments about the PC war on humo(U)r. (Sorry, couldn't resist making a bit of fun of the Brit attachment to that unneeded 'U'... nasty e-mails expected...). Many thanks to both of them, for making me think. [Digression] I think that humor is one of society's social lubricants. It can be insulting to individuals and cultures, and it does tend to stereotypes, but that is exactly why it is useful. Say that I'm upset at a man who is British. I can bloody his nose, or I can tell people a bad joke about Brits that reinforces a stereotype that has something to do with why I'm angry. Say, for instance, that he's been whinging constantly and it's driving me bats. I can punch him or tell the old one about 'How do you know a plane full of Brits has just landed? The whining doesn't stop when the engines shut off.' Yep... that is stereotypical... and insulting... and it saves him getting his nose bloody, because I've just redirected my anger to a chuckle. You may say it perpetuates stereotypes, but I don't really believe that all Brits whinge constantly, and that joke still diverts my anger from one who does. It's a way of letting off steam, and I honestly think that restricting humor, even not-so-nice humor, makes people more likely to blow up. I adore English, and I'm terribly tired of seeing it misused. I'm not talking about other English-speaking countries. The differences in usage are funny enough that I have almost fallen on my fanny laughing a few times -- it's just lucky I wear my fanny-pack closer to the Brit/Aus fanny than the American one, or I'd have crushed the darn thing. I've been known to blandly announce that it's too hot for me to wear pants when there are Brits in the area, and I'm wearing a dress (and chuckle to myself at the raised eyebrows and attempts to look). I'd direct an American who wanted to 'blow a fag' to the nearest gay bar, and hand a Brit a cigarette and lighter. I enjoy differences in language. I am not fond of grocers apostrophe (words pluralized with apostrophe: apple's, pear's, etc.). I'm not fond of confusion of 'it is' with 'its' (it's = it is). But I'll wince and carry on when I see that sort of thing. What really gets me upset is the hijacking of words for political purposes. Here are some of my pet peeves:
I'm taking back my language. From now on, I am going to call a spade a spade, not a gardening tool. Furthermore, I'm going to tell as many politically incorrect jokes as possible, and laugh at the ones directed at me (because I have always found them funny). In short, I'm starting a revolution. Would anyone like to join me? | |