| Old Articles by week 03 Mar - 09 Mar 24 Feb - 02 Mar 17 Feb - 23 Feb 10 Feb - 16 Feb 03 Feb - 09 Feb 27 Jan - 02 Feb 20 Jan - 26 Jan 13 Jan - 19 Jan 06 Jan - 12 Jan 30 Dec - 05 Jan 23 Dec - 29 Dec 16 Dec - 22 Dec 09 Dec - 15 Dec 02 Dec - 08 Dec 25 Nov - 01 Dec 18 Nov - 24 Nov 11 Nov - 17 Nov 04 Nov - 10 Nov My comments are my opinions. Links are my choice, but do not necessarily reflect my opinion. I often link to articles, sites and blogs with which I disagree. I try to look at all sides, but the fact that I'm human makes it impossible for me to view anything completely objectively. | Monday, 07 Jan 2002By Kathy Kinsley Short Stuff
16:04 EST Start or join a forum discussion! Military Pen Pals I have mentioned once or twice before, that we in the US can write to our military. Just because the holidays are over, doesn't mean an e-mail would not be appreciated. Last time I blogged this one, I asked if there was a similar site for other military. The Brits have said they don't have one, I'm not sure about Canada. However, (once again thank you to the indispensable Momma Bear) the Australian troops can be sent to via messagestothetroops -AT- defence.gov.au. I'm not writing that down as a regular address to keep them from getting spammed. If you can't figure out how to translate it, contact me! [update] I've got some really quick readers. You can leave messages for Canadian military at their message board. They also have addresses where postcards may be sent (no letters or packages). Now, when are the Brits going to get with it? 14:22 EST Start or join a forum discussion! An act of terrorism Will Vehrs doesn't see the point of declaring the kid a terrorist. He quotes Ken Layne, who says:"It's a terrorist act. Deal with it, Tom. Or go back to goddamned Pennsylvania." Will replies:"If "dealing with it" involves turning on a dime to address the sudden new threat of Future al Qaida of America student pilots, then I think Ridge's critics have as big a prioritization problem as he allegedly has." Now, I don't know why Ken and all the other bloggers who agree want the government to admit that flying a plane into a building and declaring solidarity with terrorists is a terrorist act. My best guess; though, is because it is an act of terrorism. That makes the kid a terrorist, whether he was a mixed-up kid or not. The kid qualifies as a domestic terrorist, just like Timothy McVeigh and the Unabomber (even if he was less successful than either). The anthrax that was being mailed around was also terrorism (domestic or international). If you want to know why I am getting on my soap box about it (or even if you don't), I'll tell you. The government has been doing their best to lull the populace. They've been implying that we are much more secure than on September 11, and that we can all go out and shop like good little citizens, while they take care of everything. I understand WIll's fears about more stupid laws, but what I want is to force the federal government to admit that it cannot protect us. I want them to take this seriously, and help us figure out how to protect ourselves. Local governments and businesses should put their own disaster contingency plans in place, as Andrew Olmstead argues. I would add that individuals should also do the same! What worries me is that the federal government may succeed in lulling everyone to sleep, and if another massive attack happens -- unpreparedness could cost a lot of lives. Interesting stuff:Just as I finished this, the inimitable Momma bear gave me a heads up to this Tampa Tribune article . Note the last line: "According to public records, the family name was once Bishara." 19:19 EST Start or join a forum discussion! | |