But would that make any difference?

Kofi Annan Must Go by Norm Coleman

It’s time for U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan to resign.

Over the past seven months, the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, which I chair, has conducted an exhaustive, bipartisan investigation into the scandal surrounding the U.N. Oil-for-Food program. That noble program was established by the U.N. to ease the suffering of the Iraqi people, then languishing under Saddam Hussein’s ironfisted rule, as well as the economic sanctions imposed on Iraq by the U.N. after the first Gulf War. While sanctions were designed to instigate the removal of Saddam from power, or at least render him impotent, the Oil-for-Food program was designed to support the Iraqi people with food and other humanitarian aid under the watchful eye of the U.N.

While many questions concerning Oil-for-Food remain unanswered, one conclusion has become abundantly clear: Kofi Annan should resign. The decision to call for his resignation does not come easily, but I have arrived at this conclusion because the most extensive fraud in the history of the U.N. occurred on his watch. In addition, and perhaps more importantly, as long as Mr. Annan remains in charge, the world will never be able to learn the full extent of the bribes, kickbacks and under-the-table payments that took place under the U.N.’s collective nose.

Mr. Annan was at the helm of the U.N. for all but a few days of the Oil-for-Food program, and he must, therefore, be held accountable for the U.N.’s utter failure to detect or stop Saddam’s abuses. The consequences of the U.N.’s ineptitude cannot be overstated: Saddam was empowered to withstand the sanctions regime, remain in power, and even rebuild his military. Needless to say, he made the Iraqi people suffer even more by importing substandard food and medicine under the Oil-for-Food program and pawning it off as first-rate humanitarian aid.

Mr. Coleman is being exceedingly polite. I don’t believe it was ineptitude that kept the UN’s collective eyes unseeing. Rather, it was collusion. (That is, of course, my opinion.) I predict that if we ever do get all the evidence, we will find that most of those having anything to do with the program, top management on down, were in it up to their eyeballs. Just getting rid of Kofi won’t help much.

4 Comments

  1. Posted 1 Dec, 2004 at 09:36 | Permalink

    $8 Million gone missing from the UN mission in Angola.
    $3.5 Million gone missing from the UN center in Mogadishu, Somalia.
    $10 Million that the UNICEF fund lost in Nairobi, Kenya.
    $20 Million that disappeared in Cambodia

    Just some facts I found in about ten minutes on something I wrote a while back…
    Cheers

  2. wits0
    Posted 1 Dec, 2004 at 11:31 | Permalink

    Methinks it’s possible that all this while he enjoyed an added layer of faddist protection indirectly which he fully utilised. It’s his skin color. In an era of reverse racism, PC people would always bend all the way backwards so as not to risk being called racist. But eventually just another straw will break the camel’s back.

  3. Walter E. Wallis
    Posted 1 Dec, 2004 at 12:00 | Permalink

    A resignation is not enough. The U.N. must fire Annan or it can never again be entrusted with any mission or with any money.

  4. Posted 1 Dec, 2004 at 12:10 | Permalink

    There are even talking seriously about whether or not the US should boot/leave the UN today on Fox. Not exactly something that was too common even 3 or 4 years ago.